Managing The Social Media Mix

You’ve probably heard the term “marketing mix” before, it was originally coined to explain the balance of resources applied across the 4 P’s (placement, price, product, promotion) of traditional marketing. I’ve written about this in more detail in an earlier post here. Today, I’ll be writing about the social media mix, which takes the balancing concept and applies it to social media.

Many people I talk with are overwhelmed by the amount of growth and evolution taking place in social media. It can be a struggle to build the case for portfolio adjustments when you’re too busy to keep tabs on the latest developments in social media and maintain perspective on the related trends. It’s true that what’s happening is complex but it doesn’t have to be as overwhelming as it may first appear. This post aims to put some structure around how to approach your social media mix and provide some tools to develop an online communications strategy. You should be able to run through step #4 in a few hours with your team. At that point there is some research to do, after which you can probably finish up in another few hours.

Step #1: Gather Your Social Media Portfolio

Start by doing a quick inventory of the social media channels that you already use at your organization. Write down each channel onto a sticky note (i.e. Twitter streams, Facebook pages, company blogs, newsletters, etc). A common early discovery during this process is that different channels have been set up, and are managed by, different people at your organization. The result is that communications may not be well coordinated, may duplicate efforts and/or under-serve parts of your community. For the moment, don’t worry about any social media channels that you think you want to use in the future, we’ll get to those later.

collect

Step #2: Collect Your Content

The next step is to do an inventory of the types of content that you currently distribute through social media channels and the types of conversations you’re trying to foster (i.e. product ideas, white papers, case studies, events information, customer service). Start a list but instead of making stickies at this point, simply list each content type on a page with one type per line. You’ll use this as the first column of a table in the next step (frequency & formality lens).

content

Step #3: Look Through 4 Social Media Lenses

Not all of the following lenses will be appropriate for your organization, but they represent a range of perspectives that should provide insight into your situation.

lenses

1: Consider Frequency & Formality
Frequency and formality represent two key qualities to parse how content types relate to each other. Take your list from step #2 and draw out two additional columns, the first should be labeled frequency, the second formality. Frequency and formality tend to be inversely related such that more formal messages go out less frequently. Of course, this depends on the specifics of your business. If you’ve got ten content types, then rank them from 1-10 on each scale. You’ll use this table in a later step.

2: Consider The Condensing Funnel
With this lens you’re looking to see if content is being funneled through your communication channels. For example, your organization might twitter absolutely everything it does, blog about many of those things, and use a newsletter to present only the best stuff. It’s rarely the case that any organization’s messaging will be this simple, but this lens can help highlight how and where content gets redistributed in a condensed format.

3: Consider The Waterfall
As you go through the previous step, you may find that there is a waterfall of content that runs through your channels. For example, some tweets lead to blog posts, and some blog posts might turn into white papers. You want to highlight this because it can help set up some content development practices once you have an online communications strategy in place. More on this in step #8.

4: Consider Subscription Size
Looking at social media channels based on the number of subscribers is important because it will have a huge impact on your ultimate strategy. It takes time and effort to transition communities across social media, and there is often significant attrition when you do it. Thus, it can be helpful to rank channels by their number of subscribers. Add the subscription ranking to the channel stickies from step #1.

Step #4: Connect Content & Channels

The next step is to start grouping your content types under one of the channel cards from step #1. If one content type goes under multiple channels than make a duplicate sticky for it and don’t forget to record the related formality and frequency rankings on each sticky note.

A couple things to watch out for at this point, you might find yourself putting all content types under each channel. Resist this urge! As a general rule, people tend to respond best when receiving a specific type of information from each channel they subscribe to. With this exercise you’re trying to distill what types of content are best suited to each channel. Limit the number of times you assign a content type to different channels. The limit will depend on how many content types and channels you have, but aim to have no more than three channels for each content type.

Consider this, organizations use Twitter in many different ways. Some use it to send out information about where their staff is traveling and presenting. Some use it to send out a stream of interesting industry links. Some use it to share quick ideas, or questions. These are all valid uses but each is most effective when used alone because it offers subscribers a consistent experience they can count on.

One final note on this step, it’s likely that you’ll have one social media channel whose function is to serve as a digest of all the other channels. This is completely normal, and a good thing. The key is to figure out whether that channel is a blog, a twitter stream, a newsletter, Facebook page, or something else. Limiting each content type to two or three channels will allow you to distribute content (or meta-content) through a digest and at least one other channel.

Step #5: Distilling The Essence Of Each Channel Through Consolidation

Ok, you’re half way done. Take a look at your groups of stickies as they sit under each communication channel. Add up your formality and frequency rankings separately, and calculate the averages. Now organize your groups from left to right with informal on the left and formal on the right. If there are two rankings that are the same, place the group with the greater frequency ranking to the left.

Now, look at the kinds of content in each group and see if you can articulate the essence of that content. For example, if you use twitter to share insights from conferences,  quick responses to articles, and product feature suggestions then you might say the essence is about “thoughts”. Your blog, however, might be where you explain upcoming product features, offer short form analysis of industry publications, and tell product stories, thus it could be about “ideas”. Ideas are less formal than white papers or case studies which may be better suited to a website channel about “intellectual property” (i.e. fully baked ideas). Finally, your newsletter might feature summaries and links to your best content, thus serving as a “digest”.

The next step is to assign a value to each channel. From the above example, Twitter might be about fostering community, your blog might be about brand awareness, and your newsletter might be about establishing credibility. These values will help as you start comparing channels.

match

Now that you’ve got your channels organized with distilled descriptions, related types of content and values, it’s time to compare them to each other. What you’re looking for is overlap between channels. If you find significant overlap, you should consider combining the channels into one. If the channels aren’t next to each other in your table, feel free to rearrange. You may find that frequency/formality is not the best organizing principle for your channels. If this first approach fails  organizing by value may work better for identifying consolidation opportunities.

consilidate

When you consolidate columns, you’ll save resources that can be applied to other under-served parts of your community. This is where knowing the number of subscribers can play into your calculation. For example, it may not make sense to foster two separate community groups if there is a great deal of overlap with respect to value and content types, especially if the subscriber base on one is significantly larger than the other. You may get more return on your social media investment by prioritizing one, and putting a placeholder at the other that directs people to your active channels.

You work so far should point you in the right direction, but you’ll want to validate your predictions through research. At this point you should have a solid understanding of your existing social media mix, where it’s falling short, and how it might be improved. This is enough information to develop an online survey that can be distributed via your existing channels. I don’t want to get into a detailed discussion of online surveying in this post, but everything you ask should tie back to an actionable change in your mix. In the case of the community group question above, you might ask a series of questions to understand what types of content your subscribers are interested in receiving from these channels, if they are aware of your other channels, if they subscribe through both channels, and if they would consider migrating from one to another?

Step #6: Filling In The Gaps

With online survey data in hand, and an understanding of consolidation opportunities, you should start getting a sense of any parts of your community that are under-served or not served at all. Most of the time, your community will tell you what kinds of social media investments they’d like you to make. Individuals in your community will know the landscape better than you do, so listen to them for clues about where social media can take/bring/foster your community.

At this point, I recommend running a structured ideation process with your team to generate additional ideas. I won’t get into a detailed discussion of structured ideation here, but I do want to share two quick pointers.

  1. Be Crazy – ideation works best when participants feel comfortable contributing any idea they have, no matter how crazy. Encourage outside-the-box thinking.
  2. Generate Quantity – Don’t focus on quality, it’s about quantity. This is not a finesse game at this point, the best ideas arise when you generate lots of ideas.

Next, look for similarities and differences between the ideas you’ve generated, and converge on the ones that are the best fit for your organization. At the end of this step you should have a list of ideas for where you’d like to take your social media mix. The next step is to prioritize them and structure them into a strategy.

Step #7: Building Your Strategy

Strategy starts with the process of prioritizing those initiatives that with return the greatest value for your investment. I’m not going to go into depth here about the strategy process because I’ve already written a post about that here. In this post, I share a prioritization tool that will help you identify which investments to make based on their impact and how feasible they are to complete. The second tool is focused on managing how you get from where you are today to where you want to be by tieing specific tactics to your strategy. Please go check that post out, and come back. If you run through the two exercises, you’ll end up with a road-map for an online communications strategy.

Step #8: Sketching Your Content Flow

This is the final step, and a really important one because it will show the results of all your hard work to your team in a visual way that they can easily understand. Think back to the waterfall lens from step #3, remember how you identified which channels feed into each other? This is the place to sketch out what the flow looks like. Having a picture will help your team stay on track when they’re ready to share content with your community.

flow

It may be helpful to start by putting your digest channel at the center of your diagram and working from there. What are all the inputs to the digest? How does it drive subscribers back to the original content? Spur conversations on your blog or in your networks and groups? Where does IP ultimately get spun off?

In the quick sketch above, I was working with the idea that the e-mail digest might also be where you launch your latest white papers. Perhaps initially distributing white papers through your e-mail newsletter will foster subscription growth (i.e. subscribe to the newsletter to get the latest IP before anyone else). There are obviously many tactics you can use to tune up or down specific channels and how you do it should tie back to your research findings.

Finally, all the content that you’re distributing needs to be accessible on an ongoing basis for your community. Making content accessible will also  improve your search engine optimization. Following this, changes in your marketing mix are likely to require changes to the format of your specific communication tools (i.e. website navigation, newsletter layout, etc). You can refine these changes through A/B or variance testing as you implement your strategy.

I hope this post is helpful, and I’d appreciate any feedback you have on how to improve it.

DIY Research Recruiting

A big part of getting the information you need to make smart decisions about everything from messaging, to product positioning, branding, merchandising, pricing, etc can be attained if you can just get the right people to participate in your research. In this post, I’ll outline the key elements of DIY recruiting and how it has worked for me.

Why Do Recruiting Yourself?

First off, many small and medium sized business simply can’t afford to outsource recruiting. Plus, one of the benefits of doing recruiting yourself is that you can develop relationships with your research participants. Companies that have to move fast can get a huge advantage from working with a group of research participants who have already participated in previous studies. Of course, depending on your research, it’s not always possible to develop a group as a resource. That said, developing an internal competency around recruiting will save effort over time, and can be a resource for many areas of a business.

Pre-Requisites For Recruiting

There are some things that you’ll need to know before you start:

  • Research Goals: It’s important to have clearly articulated research goals and objectives before you start any recruiting activities. This will not only tie your efforts to actionable results, it will ensure that you’ve recruiting relevant participants.
  • Participant Segmentation: Having research goals in place will support participant segmentation. You can also use existing market segments, but it’s most useful to segment your participants on a behavioral basis. So, if you’re recruiting to test brand identities for a new beverage for kids you might want to segment retailers, end consumers (kids), and purchasing consumers (moms). If you’re on a tight budget focus on the segments that have the greatest potential for returns.
  • The Screener: This is a document that will assist in screening potential candidates to participate in your research study. It will include information from the participant segmentation as well as:
    • Clear expectations for the participant – How long the commitment will be, when it will take place, etc.
    • Sample size – This can range widely by the research methodology you use. The point is to make sure that the sample is large enough to spot the trends that will serve as your design targets.
    • A demographic profile of ideal participants – Gender, age, income, family, etc.
    • Additional information that is relevant to your research – Do they use your product/service, how often, etc.
    • Background – Have they participated in such research before, do they work in the industry, etc. Depending on how your research is being conducted, this can be built into the study itself.
  • Recruiting Schedule: This is a realistic time-line for your recruiting project. Depending on your research program you may have to make a significant number of phone calls, or send a large number of e-mails, to coordinate research participants, so leave plenty of time. It takes longer to do recruiting that you’d think. Also, you can count on a decent number of participants not-showing up or finishing your study, so plan accordingly.
  • Project Management: Ideally, you’ll have a project manager of some sort to help coordinate your research program, manage the time-line, budget, and communication.
  • Compensation: You may have to compensate people for their participation in your study, so make sure you account for this in your budgeting. If you’re on a tight budget it is possible to motivate people to participate with a chance to win a significant prize which costs less than compensating every participant. The single most important motivation is a chance to make a difference though!

Finding Participants

Obviously, if you’ve got a business up and running  you may not have to look any further than your list of current or past customers. If, however, you’re working on something new such as a business plan, or a new product or service, you’ll have to recruit from the wild. This is where things get creative. Here are a couple examples from my experience.

Back in 2005 when I was working with Adina For Life, a beverage company that makes sustainable, organic and Fair Trade beverages, I was involved in developing two test markets. At that time, we had an initial product line of juices with small production runs, which meant we could go out into the field to obtain data and incorporate findings into our next  run. But, how to get the data?

Some of the DIY options included in-house focus groups, online surveying for packaging and branding, and interviews with retailers. Though we ended up doing a variety of programs, the most significant was embedded into an in-store demo program that I’d set up. Since we were already in the stores, this was a great opportunity to interface directly with customers. We developed a research guide for our “juice ambassadors” who would conduct a sampling of a variety of flavors before collecting a short paper-based survey . Because we had two test markets on opposite coasts, and were selling primarily to independant stores that sold other organic products, we had a fairly controlled market segment based on a specific purchasing behavior. This saved us from collecting too much demographic information, and allowed us to focus on the flavors and packaging, while assessing regional preferences.

Several years later, I was conducting research for another food venture that exploring a mobile BBQ restaurant concept that would essentially sell BBQ out of a truck in major urban areas. The business did not exist yet so there were no customers to reach out to. The main DIY option that came up at first was to find other mobile restaurants and talk with their customers. Of course, there were no other mobile BBQ truck nearby so that approach had certain limits. Then I started exploring online; what I found was a ton of communities that were interested in BBQ, or dining out in general. I started participating in these groups and sharing a little bit about the project. I got an enormous response and soon had hundreds of participants taking a survey. I created trackable links for each community where I invited participants (Chow magazine, Craigslist, Yelp, etc) so I could track where they were coming from.

Both of the recruiting methods I used had the benefit of developing community around the brands conducting the research. I hope these examples are helpful and inspire you to get out there and start recruiting on your own. If you’ve got examples from your own experience, please share!